An entrepreneur and I were talking about startup opportunities in the social advertising space. We ended up wondering about market size, which is an impossible question to answer on Net scale so instead we talked about Facebook’s SocialAds network. We made a guess that if it works it can be a greater than $100M revenue opportunity. I did some checking. It turns out we could be right.Here is a summary report from the data kitchen.SocialAds impressions are restricted per user on a daily basis. So you need an estimate of the number of unique users per day. Not easy to get. ValleyWag got the FB rate card from June. There the numbers are 27M registered users 54% of which return every day. comScore data puts current monthly uniques at over $30M though, which gives a guess of about 16.5M uniques/day.There is some uncertainty in how SocialAd impressions are restricted but the most conservative reading is a cap of two impressions/user/day.Next comes guessing the CPM. According to ValleyWag and the FB rate card deck they got, untargeted sponsored homepage stories have $10 CPM. SocialAds are targeted and recommended. Also, their supply is artificially restricted, which will likely push CPMs up. On the other hand, newsfeed content is engaging and there is an inverse relationship between how engaging an area is and clickthroughs from that area. So, let’s stick with $10 CPM.Doing some basic multiplication yields a potential revenue opportunity of about $120M.Now, before you start laughing at this swag, let me remind you that I sit on the opposite side of the table listening to these types of market analyses all week long. At some point, the desire to try one becomes irresistible. 😉
Subscribe
About Simeon Simeonov
Events
Get invited to events I am organizing or speaking at.
Top Rated
- Startup Founder Agreements
- Monitoring Redis with MONITOR and WireShark
- Anatomy of an online ad
- Metcalfe's Law: more misunderstood than wrong?
- Repurchase agreements: what you should know before you sign
- The best vesting schedule
- Picking the ideal market size for a startup
- Founder Agreements - Vesting, Vesting and more Vesting
- JSON and JSONlines from the command line
- Apache Spark native functions
-
Latest Content
- Apache Spark native functions
- Unicorn pressures and startup failures
- Advertising marketplace design
- Angel investing strategies
- JSON and JSONlines from the command line
- My most favorite math proof ever
- Monitoring Redis with MONITOR and WireShark
- Google and the ecosystem test
- Anatomy of an online ad
- Startup anti-pattern: platform risk
@simeons on Twitter
- RT @chrissyfarr: SCOOP: Here are the hospitals that signed a letter with Epic to oppose the HHS information blocking rules. @CNBC obtained… 3 weeks ago
- RT @DjangoWexler: I think it's time to post this @xkcd comic again... https://t.co/d00M8slASN 3 weeks ago
- @gthuang @BostonGlobe Awesome. Looking forward to some deep content. Congrats! 3 weeks ago
- RT @gthuang: I'm excited to join @BostonGlobe team as business editor. Please send me your ideas and thoughts on our business coverage: gre… 3 weeks ago
- Science vs. (bio)engineering: a clash of cultures. bit.ly/2Ot1Wkx #health #biotech https://t.co/ij18H1egNY 3 weeks ago
- ack09
- Adobe
- Advertising
- AJAX
- amazon web services
- angel investing
- Apple
- Automattic
- AWS
- B2C
- Better Advertising
- Blogging
- bootstrapping
- Broadband
- Bubble 2.0
- business
- cloud computing
- customer development
- Digital Media
- e-commerce
- entrepreneurship
- FastIgnite
- Flex
- founder agreements
- FutureOfWebApps-SF06
- Geotagging
- IE7
- Industry News
- iPhone
- lean startup
- Life
- Long Tail
- Macromedia Flash
- marketing
- Metcalfe's Law
- Microsoft
- Microsoft Office 2007
- MIT 100K
- Mobile
- MySpace
- Nantucket Conference
- network effect
- Office 2007
- OpenOffice
- opensource
- Plinky
- Polaris Venture Partners
- privacy
- Ruby
- Ruby/Rails
- SaaS
- Security
- Shopximity
- Social Advertising
- Social Commerce
- Social computing
- social media
- social networking
- startup anti-patterns
- startups
- Swoop
- technology
- TechStars
- The Long Tail
- Thing Labs
- VC
- Venture Capital
- virtual worlds
- Web 2.0
- Weblogs
- Web Services
- Windows Vista
- WordPress
“…and there is an inverse relationship between how engaging an area is and clickthroughs from that area.”
If this is true… the question then would be – which kind of ad based business models are better suited for the web – those seeking “deeper” user engagement or those with “lighter” user involvement?
Or, in other words – which kind of user attention/behavior is more valuable for an ad based web business – the strongly focused, motivated, and perhaps goal driven… or the exploratory, “fleeting,” fragmented, occasional, opportunistic one…?
“…and there is an inverse relationship between how engaging an area is and clickthroughs from that area.”
If this is true… the question then would be – which kind of ad based business models are better suited for the web – those seeking “deeper” user engagement or those with “lighter” user involvement?
Or, in other words – which kind of user attention/behavior is more valuable for an ad based web business – the strongly focused, motivated, and perhaps goal driven… or the exploratory, “fleeting,” fragmented, occasional, opportunistic one…?
Emil, the answer is that it doesn’t matter in the end. Revenue = f(traffic, effective CPM). If you have engaging content you may have lower clickthroughs (leading to a lower eCPM) but you may have a ton of traffic. Vice versa, a site like TechTarget doesn’t have huge traffic but because of its tightly focused audience + content it has fantastically high eCPM.
Take a look at this article I posted about a month ago.
http://blog.deftlabs.com/2007/10/what-is-facebook-social-application.html
Ryan, interesting analysis–thanks for sharing.
I like AppHound.