An entrepreneur and I were talking about startup opportunities in the social advertising space. We ended up wondering about market size, which is an impossible question to answer on Net scale so instead we talked about Facebook’s SocialAds network. We made a guess that if it works it can be a greater than $100M revenue opportunity. I did some checking. It turns out we could be right.Here is a summary report from the data kitchen.SocialAds impressions are restricted per user on a daily basis. So you need an estimate of the number of unique users per day. Not easy to get. ValleyWag got the FB rate card from June. There the numbers are 27M registered users 54% of which return every day. comScore data puts current monthly uniques at over $30M though, which gives a guess of about 16.5M uniques/day.There is some uncertainty in how SocialAd impressions are restricted but the most conservative reading is a cap of two impressions/user/day.Next comes guessing the CPM. According to ValleyWag and the FB rate card deck they got, untargeted sponsored homepage stories have $10 CPM. SocialAds are targeted and recommended. Also, their supply is artificially restricted, which will likely push CPMs up. On the other hand, newsfeed content is engaging and there is an inverse relationship between how engaging an area is and clickthroughs from that area. So, let’s stick with $10 CPM.Doing some basic multiplication yields a potential revenue opportunity of about $120M.Now, before you start laughing at this swag, let me remind you that I sit on the opposite side of the table listening to these types of market analyses all week long. At some point, the desire to try one becomes irresistible. 😉
Subscribe
About Simeon Simeonov
Events
Get invited to events I am organizing or speaking at.
Top Rated
- Startup Founder Agreements
- Founder Agreements - Vesting, Vesting and more Vesting
- The best vesting schedule
- JSON and JSONlines from the command line
- Repurchase agreements: what you should know before you sign
- Top Five Suggestions For Entrepreneurs From IDEO
- Picking the ideal market size for a startup
- Startup Anti-Patterns
- Ten rules for better founding teams
- Startup anti-pattern: platform risk
-
Latest Content
- Unicorn pressures and startup failures
- Advertising marketplace design
- Angel investing strategies
- JSON and JSONlines from the command line
- My most favorite math proof ever
- Monitoring Redis with MONITOR and WireShark
- Google and the ecosystem test
- Anatomy of an online ad
- Startup anti-pattern: platform risk
- Startup anti-pattern: ignorance
@simeons on Twitter
- @SparksZilla Yes, though I have also been thinking about asking for guest posts. 2 months ago
- "Our job is to walk the world with divine discontent and ask: how can we do this better?" Jeff Wilke, CEO Amazon Consumer #FortuneTech 2 months ago
- @naval @naval it's interesting to consider how blockchain networks reward work whose value is only determined in th… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 2 months ago
- @rxin kicks off #SparkSummit https://t.co/DrZTq1L0et 3 months ago
- OH “It’s only a bubble if it crashes.” -- famous (last) words of (former) hedge fund managers 3 months ago
- ack09 Adobe Advertising AJAX amazon web services angel investing Apple Automattic AWS B2C Better Advertising Blogging bootstrapping Broadband Bubble 2.0 business cloud computing customer development Digital Media e-commerce entrepreneurship Facebook FastIgnite Flex founder agreements FutureOfWebApps-SF06 Geotagging Google IE7 Industry News iPhone lean startup Life Long Tail Macromedia Flash marketing Metcalfe's Law Microsoft Microsoft Office 2007 MIT 100K Mobile MySpace Nantucket Conference network effect Office 2007 OpenOffice opensource Plinky Polaris Venture Partners privacy Ruby Ruby/Rails SaaS Security Shopximity Social Advertising Social Commerce Social computing social media social networking startup anti-patterns startups Swoop technology TechStars The Long Tail Thing Labs VC Venture Capital virtual worlds Web 2.0 Weblogs Web Services Windows Vista WordPress
“…and there is an inverse relationship between how engaging an area is and clickthroughs from that area.”
If this is true… the question then would be – which kind of ad based business models are better suited for the web – those seeking “deeper” user engagement or those with “lighter” user involvement?
Or, in other words – which kind of user attention/behavior is more valuable for an ad based web business – the strongly focused, motivated, and perhaps goal driven… or the exploratory, “fleeting,” fragmented, occasional, opportunistic one…?
“…and there is an inverse relationship between how engaging an area is and clickthroughs from that area.”
If this is true… the question then would be – which kind of ad based business models are better suited for the web – those seeking “deeper” user engagement or those with “lighter” user involvement?
Or, in other words – which kind of user attention/behavior is more valuable for an ad based web business – the strongly focused, motivated, and perhaps goal driven… or the exploratory, “fleeting,” fragmented, occasional, opportunistic one…?
Emil, the answer is that it doesn’t matter in the end. Revenue = f(traffic, effective CPM). If you have engaging content you may have lower clickthroughs (leading to a lower eCPM) but you may have a ton of traffic. Vice versa, a site like TechTarget doesn’t have huge traffic but because of its tightly focused audience + content it has fantastically high eCPM.
Take a look at this article I posted about a month ago.
http://blog.deftlabs.com/2007/10/what-is-facebook-social-application.html
Ryan, interesting analysis–thanks for sharing.
I like AppHound.