Thoughful post on the difference between symmetric (Facebook) vs. asymmetric (Twitter) relationships, courtesy of Wes @ Plinky. Advantage to Twitter for enabling attention inequality (receiving more attention than you give). Bottom line for me is that edges in the social graph should have (dynamic) meta-data as opposed to being hard-coded to “friendships” or “following” or whatever. Of course, this will be hidden from users in simple abstractions such as connecting/friending/following.
Subscribe
About Simeon Simeonov
Events
Get invited to events I am organizing or speaking at.
Top Rated
- Startup Founder Agreements
- The best vesting schedule
- Founder Agreements - Vesting, Vesting and more Vesting
- How IBM and Yahoo made Microsoft and Google
- Ten rules for better founding teams
- Twilio forwarding and CallerID hack
- Startup anti-pattern: platform risk
- Anatomy of an online ad
- About
- Founder Dilution
-
Latest Content
- Unicorn pressures and startup failures
- Advertising marketplace design
- Angel investing strategies
- JSON and JSONlines from the command line
- My most favorite math proof ever
- Monitoring Redis with MONITOR and WireShark
- Google and the ecosystem test
- Anatomy of an online ad
- Startup anti-pattern: platform risk
- Startup anti-pattern: ignorance
@simeons on Twitter
- @SparksZilla Yes, though I have also been thinking about asking for guest posts. 1 month ago
- "Our job is to walk the world with divine discontent and ask: how can we do this better?" Jeff Wilke, CEO Amazon Consumer #FortuneTech 1 month ago
- @naval @naval it's interesting to consider how blockchain networks reward work whose value is only determined in th… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 1 month ago
- @rxin kicks off #SparkSummit https://t.co/DrZTq1L0et 2 months ago
- OH “It’s only a bubble if it crashes.” -- famous (last) words of (former) hedge fund managers 2 months ago
- ack09 Adobe Advertising AJAX amazon web services angel investing Apple Automattic AWS B2C Better Advertising Blogging bootstrapping Broadband Bubble 2.0 business cloud computing customer development Digital Media e-commerce entrepreneurship Facebook FastIgnite Flex founder agreements FutureOfWebApps-SF06 Geotagging Google IE7 Industry News iPhone lean startup Life Long Tail Macromedia Flash marketing Metcalfe's Law Microsoft Microsoft Office 2007 MIT 100K Mobile MySpace Nantucket Conference network effect Office 2007 OpenOffice opensource Plinky Polaris Venture Partners privacy Ruby Ruby/Rails SaaS Security Shopximity Social Advertising Social Commerce Social computing social media social networking startup anti-patterns startups Swoop technology TechStars The Long Tail Thing Labs VC Venture Capital virtual worlds Web 2.0 Weblogs Web Services Windows Vista WordPress
Twitter is pretty much in the spotlight nowadays, but isn’t the only asymmetric platform, neither the first. From personal experience, Flickr comes to mind as an example, also the humble Ecademy (nowhere near in membership size, but worth studying for its 10 years of consistent innovation and very advanced social functionality, populated by a small but very active constellation of communities)..
The asymmetric model better reflects real social relationships: parellel co-existence of (to use classical relational terminology) both one-to-one and one-to-many links from the same node.
An interesting aspect is the concept of ‘attention relationships’ vs ‘human relationships’. While ‘human’ relationships are the fundamental (and semantically superior) fabric of social networks, attention has become an extremely important attribute of human relationships. A scarce comodity in the IO (information overload) world, attention merits modelling as an entity / object in its own right – especially because its better understanding is expected to make it more manageable and yield economic (or political) benefits.
Before Twitter, ‘plain old’ blogging was the area where dynamic metadata was (nearly) mastered in assessing the attention ‘value chain’ and propagation. Volumes of such data were much smaller, as most models were based on links, talkbacks and quotes.There are also countless dispersed blogging platforms (and non-platforms :). Twitter, with the concept of ‘following’ brings an unprecedented volume of such data, concentrated on a single platform – perhaps, as Joshua Porter suggests, the key to its monetization?
But he is,IMHO, over-obsessed with Facebook’s copycat actions and the (perceived) war between the two. If they have anything to fight over, it is just the center-stage position in the hype circus, not much else.
Vlad, I think your point about attention meriting its own modeling is spot on. We are all short on time and how we spend our minutes says a lot.